An app can look readable yet still be difficult to use with assistive technologies or larger text settings.
Test tasks, not only screens
Ask users to complete sign-in, search, submission and recovery flows with different accessibility settings.
Check semantic meaning
Labels, control order and feedback should communicate purpose to screen readers. Decorative icons should not create noisy announcements.
Practical lens: The best decision depends on users, the existing business system, data risk and the outcome the app needs to deliver. Validate these conditions before committing to features.
Check text and motion
Large fonts, landscape layouts, reduced animation and sufficient contrast can change how controls fit on a screen.
Include regression checks
New features and design updates should preserve accessible labels and navigation, not only the original screens.
Example from a business workflow
A submission button that becomes unreachable after text enlargement can stop users from completing their primary task.
Questions to take into your project discussion
Turn the guidance into a brief by confirming each of these items with the people responsible for the product:
- Screen reader flow
- Large text and zoom
- Focus and error states
- Release regression plan
What to do next
Write a one-page summary of your user groups, current workflow, necessary integrations and decisions still open. Evaluate trade-offs against those facts. For an Android-specific requirement, Archeet Infotech can discuss the implementation scope; work such as specialist SEO or hosting belongs with the relevant group concern.
These official resources explain relevant Android and platform practices. Project-specific decisions require verification at implementation time.